McAllaster

City of Pasadena v. McAllaster

Good Law
1928 Cal. LEXIS 672·204 Cal. 267·267 P. 873
Supreme Court of CaliforniaMay 28, 1928Docket No. S.F. 12726.California4,194 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Shenk, J.

This is an original application for a writ of mandate to compel the respondent, as city attorney of the City of Pasadena, to institute condemnation proceedings pursuant to an order of April 28, 1927, of the board of directors of the petitioner, City of Pasadena, for the acquisition of property necessary to widen, improve, and extend Holly Street between Marengo Avenue and Grand Avenue and to widen Grand Avenue between Holly Street and Colorado Street in said city.

As a return to the alternative writ the respondent filed a general demurrer to the petition and also an answer setting forth certain facts which are admitted by the petitioner to be true. The matter is therefore submitted on the undisputed averments of fact set forth in the petition and in the answer. From these averments it appears that on March 15, 1927, pursuant to the provisions of the Acquisition and Improvement Act of 1925 (Stats. 1925, p. 849), the board of directors of the City of Pasadena duly adopted a resolution of intention to order the acquisition of land necessary for the improvement mentioned. It also appears that all of the steps required by the act were duly and regularly taken. It is unnecessary to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.