San Francisco-Oakland Terminal Railways v. Johnson

Good Law
1930 Cal. LEXIS 361·210 Cal. 138·291 P. 197
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJuly 31, 1930Docket Nos. Sac. 4245, 4246, 4247, 4248, 4249.California6,322 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Curtis, J.

The first four of the above-entitled actions were consolidated by agreement for the purpose of trial. The fifth of said actions was by stipulation submitted to the trial court on the record established at the trial of the consolidated actions. While a separate transcript in each action has been prepared and filed in this court under the alternative method, the briefs and arguments of counsel have been addressed to the actions as a group.

These actions were instituted to recover taxes levied upon certain gross receipts of the plaintiff: during the years 1921 to 1925, inclusive, and paid under protest. They involve the same grounds of protest, except as to one item of gross receipts which is peculiar to the year 1925, and which will later be given separate consideration. During the later years under discussion the business involved in these actions was operated by the Key System Transit Company, a corporation, and in the earlier years the same business was carried on in the same way by its predecessor, the San Francisco-Oakland Terminal Railways, a corporation, and by a reorganization committee of that company. The change in control, however, had no effect on the management and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.