Gugolz

Gugolz v. Gehrkens

Good Law
164 Cal. 596·1913 Cal. LEXIS 511·130 P. 8
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJanuary 24, 1913L.A. No. 2799.California3,931 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Angellotti, J.

Plaintiff had judgment, from which and from an order denying their motion for a new trial defendants appeal. The action is one to enforce an alleged oral agreement made in 1881 by which Marie Gugolz, the deceased, agreed to make a will in favor of plaintiff to the extent of one-fourth of all the property that she should die possessed of. She died testate in January, 1907, leaving an estate of the value of about thirty-seven thousand dollars. By her will she bequeathed to various persons other than plaintiff sums aggregating about twenty-two thousand dollars. To plaintiff she left five dollars and no more. The defendants other than the executor of the will are all either legatees thereunder or heirs of the deceased. The trial court found in accord with the allegations of the complaint, and concluded that plaintiff was entitled to a one-fourth interest in the entire estate, subject to administration thereof, and that defendants are constructive trustees of such interest therein for the benefit or use of plaintiff.

Plaintiff was a nephew of the.deceased husband of Marie Gugolz, Caspar Gugolz, being the son of a brother of said Caspar Gugolz. He lived with and was maintained and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.