Tappendorff

Tappendorff v. Moranda

Good Law
134 Cal. 419·1901 Cal. LEXIS 789·66 P. 491
Supreme Court of CaliforniaOctober 28, 1901S.F. No. 1980.California1,040 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Harrison, J.

The plaintiff is the wife of Fredrich Tappendorff, and seeks by this action to recover from the defendant the possession of certain real property in the county of Humboldt. In her complaint, after setting forth facts under which a homestead might be declared by her husband, she alleges that on the sixteenth day of May, 1878, her husband executed and acknowledged “ a valid declaration of homestead ” upon said premises, and that the same was on said day recorded in the office of the county recorder. A copy of the said declaration is attached to the complaint, and by averment made a part thereof. This copy contained the statement “that the actual cost value of said property is three thousand dollars.” The plaintiff further alleges that on October 20, 1897, her husband executed to the defendant a lease of said land for the term of five years, under which the defendant entered and took possession thereof; that she did not unite or join with her husband in the execution of the said lease; that she has demanded possession of the said premises from the defendant, and that he has refused to deliver the same, and still withholds them from her. The defendant demurred to the complaint, upon…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.