In Re City and County of San Francisco

Good Law
1925 Cal. LEXIS 383·195 Cal. 426·233 P. 965
Supreme Court of CaliforniaFebruary 21, 1925Docket No. S.F. 11352.California5,383 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Richards, J.

This application for a writ of mandate was presented to this court upon an agreed statement of facts. The petitioners purport to make the application under the provisions of sections 1138 to 1140, inclusive, of the Code of Civil Procedure, which relate to the submission of controversies which might be the subject of a civil action to courts which would have jurisdiction of such action, upon an agreed statement of facts. It is not necessary to determine whether these sections of the code have application to the submission of causes to this court, since the facts' set forth in the application herein would suffice to support the issuance of a writ of mandate if, as a matter of law, such writ should issue. The stipulation of the respondent, taken with his appearance upon the hearing, amounts to a return admitting the facts, but demurring to the sufficiency of the application as a matter of law. The petitioners herein seek to compel the respondent, as auditor of the city and county of San Francisco, to audit and approve a certain claim and demand in favor of the petitioner San Francisco Exposition Company in the sum" of $100,000, based upon certain proceedings had and taken by and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.