Turner

Turner v. Hearst

Good Law
137 Cal. 232·1902 Cal. LEXIS 536·70 P. 18
Supreme Court of CaliforniaSeptember 6, 1902S.F. No. 2174.California955 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Smith, J.

This case was before the court on a former appeal by the defendant from a judgment against him, which was reversed (Turner v. Hearst, 115 Cal. 394 ). The present appeal is by the plaintiff from a judgment in his favor for the sum of one hundred and fifty dollars, and from an order denying his motion for new trial.

The suit was brought to recover damages for a publication concerning the plaintiff in the defendant’s newspaper, the Examiner, of date December 7, 1893, which, as alleged in the complaint, is as follows:—

There is no denial of any of the allegations of the complaint. But it is pleaded by the defendant in mitigation of damages that the publication was the result of a mistake made by a reporter of the defendant’s newspaper in transferring to its columns facts reported in the Post, by which the plaintiff was inadvertently referred to instead of another, and that “when this mistake came to the knowledge of the defendant he published a full and complete statement of the circumstances under which the mistake came to be made and fully exonerated the plaintiff from any and all of the matters stated in said item.” This retraction was published February 4, 1894, nearly sixty…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.