Jordan

Bullfrog Goldfield R. R. Co. v. Jordan

Good Law
174 Cal. 342·1917 Cal. LEXIS 796·163 P. 40
Supreme Court of CaliforniaFebruary 2, 1917L. A. No. 4631.California1,522 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Henshaw, J.

Petitioner, a railroad corporation, organized and existing under the laws of the state of Nevada, made tender to respondent, Secretary of State of the state of Cali-" fornia, and offered for filing in the office of that official a certified copy of its articles of incorporation, and a certified copy of a resolution of its board of directors designating an agent for the state of California upon whom process issued out of the courts of this state might be served, and with these papers tendered the fee of $75 as a prerequisite to such filing. Respondent refused to accept and file the papers until, in addition, petitioner paid the license tax contemplated by the statute adopted in 1915. (Stats. 1915, c. 190.) Petitioner then sued for and obtained this alternative writ of mandate.

The facts are not in controversy. The single question presented is the legal one, whether or not under those facts petitioner should be called upon to pay this additional license tax. The petitioner owns and operates a steam railroad which begins and ends entirely within the state of Nevada. In the city of Los Angeles, state of California, it maintains the general offices of its company. At these offices…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.