Carlson

Carlson v. Sheehan

Bad Law
157 Cal. 692·1910 Cal. LEXIS 314·109 P. 29
Supreme Court of CaliforniaMay 11, 1910S.F. No. 5124.California1,741 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Shaw, J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover the ■sum of $1715.00, alleged to be the balance due and unpaid for work done and materials furnished by plaintiff for defendant in constructing a building at defendant’s special instance and request. After the plaintiff had introduced his evidence upon the trial the court, on motion of the defendant, ordered a nonsuit. The plaintiff appeals from the judgment thereupon rendéred. .

The plaintiff and defendant entered into a contract whereby the plaintiff agreed to erect a building upon a lot belonging to the defendant for the sum of $3680. The plaintiff completed the building in part only and the defendant paid him twenty-one hundred dollars upon the contract. The remainder was to be paid on and after completion. The cost of finishing the uncompleted part of the building would have been about five hundred dollars. The claim of the plaintiff is that he was prevented or excused from completing the building according to the agreement by the conduct of the defendant. The object of the suit is to recover the difference between the value of the work done at the contract rate and the amount paid by the defendant.

We do not think there is any merit…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.