Kleebauer

Kleebauer v. Western Fuse & Explosives Co.

Good Law
138 Cal. 497·1903 Cal. LEXIS 710·60 L.R.A. 377·71 P. 617
Supreme Court of CaliforniaFebruary 14, 1903S.F. No. 2419.California3,060 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Van Dyke, J.

This is an action for damages. It is alleged in the complaint that defendant was at the time, and prior to the nineteenth day of July, 1898, engaged in manufacturing and storing powder, dynamite, nitroglycerine, and other high explosives and fuses on its premises near Melrose, in Alameda County, and that, by reason of the negligence and carelessness of the defendant, a large quantity of fuse and explosives belonging to it, and under its control, on said day exploded with great violence, whereby plaintiffs’ house was injured and damaged to the extent of four hundred dollars, for which amount damages are claimed. The answer denies that the defendant was engaged in the manufacture or storage of powder, dynamite, nitroglycerine, or other high explosives, but admits that it was the owner of and operating a factory for the manufacture of fuse on its premises; and denies that, by reason of the premises mentioned in the plaintiffs’ com plaint, or by reason of any negligence or carelessness on the part of the defendant, plaintiffs have been, or ever were, damaged in any sum whatever.

The action was tried in the superior court of San Francisco, before a jury, and resulted in a judgment for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.