Hermanson

Hermanson v. Board of Pension Commissioners

Good Law
1933 Cal. LEXIS 443·219 Cal. 622·28 P.2d 21
Supreme Court of CaliforniaDecember 29, 1933Docket No. L.A. 14305.California989 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

This is a petition for a writ of mandate. Petitioner, while in the course of his duties as a member of the fire department of the city of Los Angeles, was injured, and on February 25, 1925, was granted a pension of $1,020 per year, for disability. He received monthly payments until March, 1927, when, without notice to him and after examination by three practicing physicians, the respondent board concluded that his disability had ceased, and terminated the pension as of March 15, 1927. Petitioner was directed to report for active duty, and refused to do so. No demand for pension payments was made by him until over three years later, when, on April 17, 1930, he made such demand. Thereafter, on or about June 3, 1930, he commenced this proceeding in mandamus to compel respondents to make all payments which would have been made under the pension for the three-year period, and thereafter to continue payments indefinitely. The theory of petitioner is that the order terminating the pension was void because made without prior notice to him and opportunity for a hearing; and that the pension has been in existence during this whole period and is still in force.

The trial court found that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.