Almendares

People v. Almendares

Good Law
136 Cal. 660·1902 Cal. LEXIS 783·69 P. 492
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJune 25, 1902Crim. No. 849.California363 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Garoutte, J.

The defendant has been convicted of the crime of murder and sentenced to suffer capital punishment. The court is greatly embarrassed in the consideration of the appeal by reason of the fact that there is no brief upon file upon the part of the defendant. Again, the trial judge refused to settle the bill of exceptions presented by defendant upon his appeal from the order denying a motion for a new trial, basing his refusal upon the ground that the bill was not presented in time. This court has often held that it will consider a bill of exceptions settled upon appeal in a criminal case upon the part of a defendant, even though the statutory time for its presentation to the trial judge for settlement had expired when it was presented; and in this case, while the law upon the showing made justified the action of the court in refusing to settle the bill, still, considering its gravity, the life of a human being resting in the balance, the judge might well have tempered justice with mercy, and have settled the bill; but he did not do so, and necessarily there is nothing before this court for its consideration upon the appeal from the order denying the motion for a new trial.

Upon the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.