Bull

Bull v. Coe

Bad Law
1888 Cal. LEXIS 619·77 Cal. 54·18 P. 808
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJune 27, 188812055California2,881 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Hayne, J.

Suit to foreclose a mortgage. The material facts are as follows:

Charles L. Strong, John 0. Earl, and Alpheus Bull agreed together to purchase and operate a certain mine. Each was to furnish one third of the capital, and be interested in that proportion. Strong had no money, and Bull agreed to advance his share, taking as security a mortgage upon a piece of real property of which Mrs. Strong was the owner, and upon which a homestead had been declared, and taking, also, the title to the mine in his own name as additional security. The mortgage was by a deed absolute in form, duly signed and acknowledged by the Strongs. The terms of the contract ■were in a separate paper signed by Bull only. The money was advanced by Bull as required from time to time, in accordance with the terms of his contract. After a time the mine proved a failure, and Strong died. The defendant Coe was appointed administrator of his estate, and gave notice to the creditors to present their claims. Bull did not present any claim against the estate, but commenced his action of foreclosure upon the property mortgaged by Mrs. Strong, under section 1500 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The court below gave judgment…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.