Slye

Schwerin Estate Realty Co. v. Slye

Good Law
173 Cal. 170·1916 Cal. LEXIS 383·159 P. 420
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJuly 26, 1916S. F. No. 6934.California1,641 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Melvin, J.

Plaintiff sued to quiet its title to certain real property in San Mateo County. Defendants answered,, setting up certain contracts of sale upon which they had paid to plaintiff five thousand dollars on account of the purchase price of the land. In the answer it was averred that the consideration for the five thousand dollars wholly failed because plaintiff was not by itself in possession of the land, but that the premises were held by divers persons who had growing crops thereon; and because plaintiff had failed to-account for certain, receipts and disbursements as stipulated in the contracts. There was a cross-complaint by which the writings between the parties to the action were set up, and the inability of the vendor to give possession of the land on account of the occupancy and use thereof by other persons was pleaded as well as the failure of plaintiff to account to defendants as provided by the contract. The prayer of the cross-complaint was for five thousand dollars, and the cross-complainants asked that the amount of any judgment which might be given in their behalf should be made a lien on the property. Issue was joined on all of the allegations of the cross-complaint,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.