Manning

Manning v. App Consolidated Gold Mining Co.

Good Law
171 Cal. 610·1915 Cal. LEXIS 670·154 P. 301
Supreme Court of CaliforniaDecember 23, 1915S. F. No. 6741.California2,647 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Melvin, J.

Appeal by plaintiff from the judgment. Plaintiff sued as a judgment creditor of the App Consolidated Gold Mining Company (which hereafter we shall designate as the “App Company”). The complaint charged that certain conveyances and other transactions upon the part of the App Company and the other defendants were fraudulent, and that the property and assets of that corporation were transferred for the purpose of preventing him from securing anything in satisfaction of his judgment. We shall abbreviate the names of the other corporate defendants, The Rawhide Gold Mining Company and the Central Land and Trust Company to “Rawhide Company” and “Trust Company,” respectively.

According to the allegations of the complaint, the corporate defendants Rawhide and App companies were engaged in gold mining in Tuolumne County. William A. Nevills owned a majority of the stock of each corporation.

In February, 1902, the plaintiff, who was employed in a mine belonging to the App Company, was seriously injured by a falling timber. In April, 1902, the said corporation conveyed all of the property of which it was then the owner to the Rawhide Company, in consideration of the issuance to it of $14,975…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.