Heier

Heier v. Krull

Good Law
160 Cal. 441·1911 Cal. LEXIS 532·117 P. 530
Supreme Court of CaliforniaAugust 4, 1911Sac. No. 1881.California1,640 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Shaw, J.

The defendants appeal from a judgment in

favor of plaintiff.

The object of plaintiff’s suit was to enjoin the defendants from enlarging Old Live Oak Slough and from constructing or maintaining a certain proposed ditch, and from doing any other act or thing whereby any of the waters falling upon the lands northeasterly of a certain alleged ridge, some six miles northerly of plaintiff’s lands, might be precipitated, or the flow thereof accelerated, to or upon the plaintiff’s lands. He also asks for a mandatory injunction requiring defendants to fill up so much of said ditch as had been dug before the suit was begun.

The plaintiff’s lands consist of one hundred and eighty acres. He alleges that about six miles north thereof there is a high ridge of ground which, unless interfered with by the defendants, does and will effectually prevent the water falling upon the land northerly and easterly thereof from flowing down to and upon his own land. He further alleges that south of said ridge there extends from said ridge, in a southerly direction, for a part of the distance to his land a slough known as Old Live Oak Slough, with, which is connected an artificial ditch extending therefrom…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.