Hilmer

Hilmer v. Superior Court of S.F.

Good Law
1934 Cal. LEXIS 498·220 Cal. 71·29 P.2d 175
Supreme Court of CaliforniaFebruary 5, 1934Docket No. S.F. 14984.California1,120 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Waste, J.

It appears that petitioner procured a final decree of divorce from her husband, Marshall Hilmer, on August 10, 1932. The custody of the minor child of the parties was awarded to her, and the father of the child was directed to pay $50 a month for the child’s support. Contempt proceedings have been necessary from time to time to compel payment of this award. In March, 1933, petitioner moved the respondent court for an increase of the support allowance and for an order compelling the defendant husband to furnish security for its prompt and continued payment. This motion was based on sections 139 and 140 of the Civil Code. In support thereof petitioner filed an affidavit wherein it is averred that the defendant husband repeatedly has been delinquent in making the monthly support payments; that recently and by reason of his father’s demise he had come into an inheritance, not yet distributed, of approximately $12,000; that he is intemperate and incapable of handling money judiciously, and is neither a fit nor proper person to be entrusted with the monthly allowance of the minor child.

After hearing, the motion was denied, whereupon petitioner instituted this proceeding in mandamus to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.