Johnson v. Williams

Good Law
153 Cal. 368·1908 Cal. LEXIS 469·95 P. 655
Supreme Court of CaliforniaApril 24, 1908Sac. No. 1617.California2,323 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Angellotti, J.

This is a proceeding instituted in this court to obtain a peremptory writ of mandate requiring the defendant to attest and sign, as auditor of Sacramento County, certain proposed bonds of said county, which have been ordered issued by the board of supervisors, after such issuance had been authorized by the electors of the county at a special election held in the manner provided by the constitution and statutes. The auditor’s refusal to perform this official action is based on his claims that the bonds cannot be legally issued, and the matter was submitted for decision upon a demurrer to the petition.

The proposed bonds are of three different binds:—

The city of Sacramento is a municipal corporation existing under a freeholders’ charter, and having its corporate bound aries within the boundaries of the county of Sacramento. Under the existing laws applicable to all municipalities, it is required to construct and maintain its own streets and bridges without aid from any county fund, and is exempt from certain road taxes by reason of the following provision of section 2 of the Highway Act of February 28, 1883,—viz. “Provided further, that nothing herein contained shall be deemed to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.