Pixley

Pixley v. Saunders

Good Law
168 Cal. 152·1914 Cal. LEXIS 300·141 P. 815
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJuly 3, 1914S.F. No. 6024.California602 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Upon the last submission of this case to the court in Bank the following opinion was then adopted:

Plaintiffs, who are the owners of a tract of land in Marin County known as the Pixley Ranch, brought this action to restrain the tax-collector from selling said property for delinquent taxes levied thereon by the authorities of Sanitary District No. 2 of Marin County. From a judgment upholding the validity of the tax an appeal is taken. And there is also an appeal from the order dissolving the injunction whereby the tax-collector was restrained .from proceeding to sell the property pendente lite.

The learned judge of the superior court who presided at the trial of the cause put his “Judgment and Decree” in the form of an opinion setting forth the law which he considered applicable to the case. As we agree with his views, we adopt his opinion, which is in the following language:

“The cause was submitted to the court upon an agreed statement, from which the following facts appear:

“In Woodward v. Fruitvale Sanitary District, 99 Oal. 554, 562, [ 34 Pac. 239 ], the validity of the organization of a sanitary district covering wholly unincorporated territory was in question. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.