East Shore Co. v. Richmond Belt Railway

Good Law
172 Cal. 174·1916 Cal. LEXIS 509·155 P. 999
Supreme Court of CaliforniaFebruary 28, 1916S. F. No. 6781. Department One.California2,330 words

Opinion

Concurring Opinion

Hearing in Bank denied. *Page 182

Lead Opinion

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 176 The action was for partition of lands. The Richmond Belt Railway had obtained from the East Shore Company, before the action was begun, a deed purporting to convey to it, in severalty and entirety, certain strips or parcels of the common land. The deed stated that the strips were conveyed "as and for a right of way" for a railroad "to have and to hold all and singular the said premises, right and privilege unto" the said grantee "so long as the same shall be used for railroad or terminal purposes." During the progress of the suit, and before the decision in the court below, some of the common owners made deeds purporting to convey to third persons, in severalty, the whole title to other specific parcels of the common land. After the evidence was closed and the cause was submitted the court, on motion of plaintiff, opened the case and allowed proof to be made of these conveyances. This was done over the objection of the appellant. The court found as a fact that the land was susceptible of division between the common owners without material…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.