Leonard

Leonard v. Osburn

Good Law
169 Cal. 157·1915 Cal. LEXIS 478·146 P. 530
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJanuary 22, 1915S.F. No. 6221.California1,470 words

Opinion

Addendum

This is an action to quiet title. Plaintiff recovered judgment as prayed for, from which defendant appeals. The common source of title was in F.S. Lawrence and E.W. Darling. Plaintiff claims by mesne conveyances through a deed dated December 16, 1892, from the common grantors to Mrs. Linda M. Adams. This deed was filed for record in the office of the county recorder of Santa Cruz County on May 23, 1893. By its terms it conveyed a lot of land lying in Twin Lake Park, in Santa Cruz County, described as lot 10 . . . block 2, subdivision No. 6, as the same is shown on the map of Twin Lake Park made by E.D. Perry, surveyor, filed August 22, 1891, in the office of the recorder of Santa Cruz County. Defendant's claim is based on mesne conveyances through a deed dated August 4, 1892, from the common grantors to Mrs. Celia Higgins. The deed was filed for record August 27, 1892 — some four months prior to the date of the deed to Linda M. Adams, under which plaintiff claims — and, according to its *Page 159 terms, conveyed a lot lying in Twin Lake Park in Santa Cruz County, described as lot 10, block 2 . . . subdivision No. 6, as the same is shown on the map of Twin Lake Park…

Lead Opinion

The court is satisfied with the discussion of the case in the opinion of the district court of appeal of the first district, and for the reasons stated in that opinion, it is ordered that the judgment be reversed. We cite the additional case of Hall v. Bartlett, 158 Cal. 641 , [ 112 P. 176 ], which is very closely in point. The following is the opinion of the District Court of Appeal of the first appellate district, above referred to and approved, rendered on September 24, 1914.

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.