Pacific States Corp. v. Pan American Bank

Good Law
1930 Cal. LEXIS 406·210 Cal. 472·292 P. 494
Supreme Court of CaliforniaOctober 15, 1930Docket No. L.A. 12433.California289 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Appellant filed in the court below a complaint styled “Complaint for Declaratory Relief and Injunction.” General demurrers thereto were sustained without leave to amend and judgment of dismissal was duly entered and an appeal taken to this court. Respondents move for an order dismissing the appeal, and/or an order affirming judgment, on a number of grounds, the substance of which is that appellant has not printed in its opening brief or in any supplement thereto such portions of the record as it desires to call to the attention of the court, as required by section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure, in support of its plea for a reversal of the judgment; and has not complied with rule VIII of this court relating to the same matters.

Appellant’s short brief may be subject to some of the criticisms advanced by respondents, but the substance of the complaint and demurrers does quite clearly appear, and the court’s attention is “attracted” to paragraphs eleven, thirteen and eighteen of the long lease between the parties. It is stated in the brief “that there was an actual controversy relating to the legal rights and duties of the respective parties and the prayer of the complaint…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.