McNutt

McNutt v. Hannon

Good Law
183 Cal. 537·1920 Cal. LEXIS 439·191 P. 1108
Supreme Court of CaliforniaAugust 12, 1920L. A. No. 5337.California1,956 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Wilbur, J.

Cyrus F. McNutt and J. E. Hannon, the defendant, were law partners from 1897 until the death of the former, May 31, 1912. The plaintiff, as executor of the will of the deceased partner, brought this action against the surviving partner for an accounting and recovered judgment for $9,292.70, being one-third of the fees that the trial court found resulted from the partnership. Defendant appeals from the judgment on a bill of exceptions, and the plaintiff, while claiming that there should have been an equal division of the $27,878.10 fees received by the surviving partner, does not appeal.. The court found that the plaintiff is “equitably entitled to receive one-third” thereof.

The defendant claims that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the finding that the partnership existed at the time of the death of plaintiff’s testator, and the finding that the fees defendant was required to account for were' received for the partnership; and even if they were for partnership business, that the decision of the trial court was inequitable, inasmuch as most of the work for which the fees were paid was done by defendant after the death of his partner. The first claim of the defendant is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.