Wood

Wood v. Peterson Farms Co.

Good Law
214 Cal. 94·3 P.2d 922
Supreme Court of CaliforniaOctober 15, 1931Docket Nos. L.A. 13021, 13022.California1,401 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Waste, J.

Respondent separately moves to dismiss the appeal in each of the above-entitled causes. The cause numbered L. A. No. 13021 was instituted by respondent to foreclose a real estate mortgage. All of the defendants but the appellant Peters defaulted. Judgment was entered for respondent on December 29, 1930. On January 2, 1931, the appellant filed her 'notice of appeal and her request for a transcript. The clerk’s transcript was certified by that officer on January 31, 1931. Subsequently, the respondent moved to terminate the proceedings for a record, which motion was granted by the trial court on March 16, 1931. On the same day the reporter’s transcript, certified by him, was filed in the court below, but the trial judge refused and still refuses to authenticate it. Under rule I of this court, the appellant was required to file her record here not later than forty days after the termination of the proceedings in the court below, or on April 25, 1931. It appears from the various papers filed in connection with the motion to dismiss, and from the notations of our clerk, that the clerk’s transcript, duly certified, was in fact deposited in this court for filing prior to the expiration of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.