L.A. & Redondo R.R. v. New Liverpool Salt Co.

Good Law
150 Cal. 21·1906 Cal. LEXIS 193·87 P. 1029
Supreme Court of CaliforniaOctober 11, 1906L.A. No. 1657.California2,555 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Shaw, J.

This is an action to correct a mistake in a deed executed by the plaintiffs to the defendant. The plaintiff Redondo Improvement Company was merely a nominal party to the deed as well as to this action. In mentioning the plaintiff in this opinion we refer only to the railroad company.

The mistake alleged to have been made consisted of the failure to insert in the description of the property an exception which, if inserted, would have excluded from the description certain territory otherwise embraced within the lines of a tract described in the deed by metes and bounds. The court found that the mistake was made as alleged, and gave judgment for the reformation of the deed as prayed for. The principal contention upon the appeals, which are taken from the judgment and from the order denying a new trial, is that the evidence does not sustain the finding or judgment.

In July, 1901, the plaintiff executed to the defendant a lease, for the term of seven years, upon certain described property. The lease contained a clause to the effect that at any time during the term the defendant, at its option, might purchase of the plaintiff the leased premises for the price of twelve thousand five…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.