Dowling

Dowling v. Spring Valley Water Co.

Good Law
174 Cal. 218·1917 Cal. LEXIS 777·162 P. 894
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJanuary 15, 1917S. F. No. 7156.California1,422 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Melvin, J.

J. J. Dowling filed a hill in equity by which he sought to have the court set aside in part a decree quieting the title of the Spring Valley Water Company to certain land in San Francisco pursuant to a proceeding under the statute commonly known as the “MeEnerney Act.” A general demurrer to the second amended complaint was sustained and judgment was entered for defendants. From said judgment plaintiff appeals.

Among the allegations made by appellant in the second amended complaint are in substance the following ones: That from December 30, 1910, to July 14, 1911, and up to the time of a certain execution sale, one Alla J. Tyler was the owner in fee of the property in dispute; that by reason of certain street work performed by plaintiff as a contractor, after due authorization, he acquired a lien on said property amounting to $6.08; that on January 21, 1907, plaintiff began a suit against Alla J. Tyler to foreclose said lien, resulting in a judgment in his favor for $33.38 made a lien on the property; that execution issued; that plaintiff became the purchaser of the property at the sheriff’s sale; that since October 9, 1911, the date of said sale, plaintiff has owned the land in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.