Seches

Seches v. Bard

Good Law
1932 Cal. LEXIS 378·215 Cal. 79·8 P.2d 835
Supreme Court of CaliforniaFebruary 17, 1932Docket No. L.A. 13382.California1,078 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

The petition for a transfer of this cause to this court was granted in order to give further consideration to the point raised by appellants that in part this action had been prematurely brought. Based on this contention the appellate court partially reversed the judgment of the trial court. Upon mature deliberation we are of the opinion that, as applied to the facts of this ease, the point is without merit.

It appears that the defendants, Mr. and Mrs. Louis Bard, and plaintiff’s assignors, Mr. and Mrs. Arthur Bard, were engaged. jointly in various theatrical enterprises resulting in a considerable amount of litigation. In December, 1928, the Bards entered into an agreement of settlement with their opponents, by the terms of which the Bards became entitled to the sum of $78,000, $30,000 of which was paid to them in cash, the balance being evidenced by twelve promissory notes of the sum of $4,000 each, payable progressively one each month. The makers of these notes were solvent, and the notes were guaranteed by the West Coast Theaters, Inc., a solvent concern. The present action arose because of divergent claims made by the two Bard families to the proceeds of this settlement. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.