Estate of Cross

In Re Estate of Cross

Good Law
163 Cal. 778·1912 Cal. LEXIS 476·127 P. 70
Supreme Court of CaliforniaSeptember 24, 1912L.A. No. 3121.California922 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Henshaw, J.

John Cross and Laura L. Cross, his wife, had been married for forty-five years. They were childless and owned property of considerable value. In May, 1898, they executed their joint and mutual wills. By paragraph I of those wills it was provided:

By paragraph II it was provided:

Specific legacies were then made to named legatees. It was declared that the value of their property was estimated at fifty thousand dollars; and provision was made for the ratable increase or decrease of these legacies in the event that the estate should prove to be of greater or less value than was estimated. It was further provided:

Subsequently, in March, 1909, John and Laura L. Cross, in like manner, executed a joint and mutual codicil to their last will, which codicil increased legacies given by the original will to certain legatees, revoked another legacy because of the legatee’s death, and provided in paragraph 6 as follows:

John Cross died and Laura, his wife, surviving him for more than thirty days, made application for the probate of the will and codicil, and for issuance to herself as executrix of letters testamentary. Opposition was made by Albert P. Cross, Charles R. Diver, and J. E.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.