Dickinson

Dickinson v. Southern Pacific Co.

Good Law
172 Cal. 727·1916 Cal. LEXIS 595·158 P. 183
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJune 9, 1916L. A. No. 3589. Department One.California2,132 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Action to recover damages for the alleged negligent killing of plaintiff's intestate. The defendants are *Page 728 railway corporations, the one owning and the other operating under lease a line of steam railway running through the city of Bakersfield. A train of said line ran into a buggy which the decedent, Samuel Dickinson, was driving, and Dickinson was instantly killed. Judgment went in favor of the plaintiff for $10,230. From this judgment, and from an order denying their motion for a new trial, the defendants appeal. There is no room to doubt that the evidence warranted the jury in finding that there had been negligence in the operation of the train. The appellants contend, however, that the decedent was himself guilty of contributory negligence, and that for this reason their motion for a nonsuit should have been granted. Chester Avenue, the street upon which Samuel Dickinson was driving, runs north and south in the city of Bakersfield. It is intersected at right angles by Thirty-third Street. The railway track runs in an easterly and westerly direction and crosses Chester Avenue at Thirty-third Street. The trains coming over the track toward Bakersfield approach from the…

Concurring Opinion

Hearing in Bank denied. *Page 733

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.