Burt

Burt v. Los Angeles Olive Growers Assn.

Good Law
175 Cal. 668·1917 Cal. LEXIS 740·166 P. 993
Supreme Court of CaliforniaAugust 6, 1917Sac. No. 2335.California4,171 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Henshaw, J.

Plaintiff sued defendant to recover the price of olives purchased by defendant from plaintiff under a written contract. The agreement was made on the seventh day of July, 1913, and was between the parties to this action. It provided “that the party of the second part [defendant] does by these presents purchase all the crop of olives for the year 1913 growing on the trees situate on the following described real property: . . .

The complaint charged for nonpayment under the terms of the contract of the value of many thousand pounds of olives harvested by defendant, and for a lesser quantity not harvested but left on the trees or as windfalls, payment for which it is alleged was due under the contract... It was further alleged that none of the olives which had been harvested prior to December 7, 1913, had been rendered unfit for pickling because of frost. Judgment was sought for the total amount of the value of these olives under the contract, amounting to $21,387.27, with interest and costs of suit. The answer admitted the execution of the agreement. It denied the total quantity of olives harvested under the contract and declared a lesser amount. It denied that any olives were left…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.