Ransford

Ransford v. Ainsworth

Good Law
1925 Cal. LEXIS 313·196 Cal. 279·237 P. 747
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJune 22, 1925Docket No. S.F. 10873.California3,525 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Richards, J.

This appeal is by the defendant Minerva I. Ainsworth from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff and against both defendants for the sum of .two thousand dollars based upon the verdict of a jury in an action to recover damages for injuries received by the plaintiff in a collision between the automobile of the defendant and appellant M. I. Ainsworth while being driven and operated by her husband and codefendant A. 6. Ainsworth on and along the streets of the city of Napa. The sole question presented upon this appeal is as to whether the evidence was sufficient to justify the verdict and judgment against the appellant herein. In entering upon this inquiry there" are certain admitted facts which should be stated so as to clear the way for the main contention of the appellant herein. It is an admitted fact that the defendants are husband and wife and were living together as such at the time of the injuries complained of and for many years prior thereto, upon a ranch near Trubody station, nine miles north of Napa, which was the separate property of the appellant herein. It is also an admitted fact that the automobile which the defendant A. G. Ainsworth was driving at the time of said…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.