Armstrong

Armstrong v. Sacramento Valley R. Co.

Good Law
179 Cal. 648·1919 Cal. LEXIS 576·178 P. 516
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJanuary 30, 1919Sac. Nos. 2883, 2884.California1,154 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Lennon, J.

From the record before us upon two motions to dismiss pending and independent appeals of the defendants and intervener in the hbove-entitled action the following uneontroverted facts appear. By the action plaintiff sought and secured a judgment against the defendants in the sum of $827.20. The intervener claimed to have some interest in the money in suit, but the trial court found to the contrary and entered judgment accordingly. The plaintiff’s cause of action arose out of a written contract of purchase and sale whereby the defendants, as parties of the first part, agreed to pay in designated installments to plaintiff, as party of the second part, certain moneys aggregating twenty-five thousand dollars as part payment of the purchase price of plaintiff’s right, title, and interest in and to certain described real property situate in the counties of Glenn and Colusa. The action. was one of twenty similar suits instituted against the defendants for the recovery of the several installments of the purchase price of the said property. The judgment appealed from was entered on the eighth day of October, 1915. The intervener and defendants gave their notices of appeal respectively on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.