Morrison

Morrison v. Smith Bros., Inc.

Good Law
1930 Cal. LEXIS 299·211 Cal. 36·293 P. 53
Supreme Court of CaliforniaNovember 3, 1930Docket Nos. S.F. 13361, 13362, 13169, 13170.California2,934 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Waste, J.

These several actions were commenced to recover damages for the alleged wrongful death of certain named persons. Briefly, and in substance, the complaints allege that the defendant district, organized under and pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Utility District Act (Stats. 1921, p. 245), and while acting within the scope of the powers therein conferred, had adopted and entered into a project known as the “Mokelumne River Project” as a part of its plan for the conveyance, sale and distribution of water to the inhabitants of the district; that in furtherance of said project it had entered into a contract with its co-defendant, Smith Bros., Inc., for the construction of a certain tunnel and settling basin or diversion chamber; and that by reason of the negligence of said defendants the waters of San Pablo Creek flowed into and through said tunnel and connected workings, causing the death by drowning of four named persons. The defendant district demurred generally to the several complaints, and the court below sustained each demurrer without leave to amend. From the judgment of dismissal thereafter entered in favor of the district the respective plaintiffs appealed to this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.