Lacey
Murphy v. Lacey
Opinion
Lead Opinion
Well, J.
Plaintiffs, as the assignees of one L. J. Brown, brought an action against E. V. Lacey and Veronica E. Lacey on two counts for the recovery of the sum of $2,000. The first count stated a case for money had and received growing out of the same statement of facts specifically pleaded in the second count. 'Said facts are substantially as follows: On June 5, 1924, defendants E. V. Lacey and Veronica E. Lacey entered into a contract whereby said defendants agreed to sell to plaintiff’s assignor, L. J. Brown, and he agreed to purchase from them at the agreed purchase price of $150,000 certain real property situate in the city and county of San Francisco. Said contract further provided that said sale was subject to a prior subsisting agreement of sale of said real property entered into by defendant Lacey as seller and one T. J. Neilan and others as purchasers. The parties to said contract referred to said agreement of sale existing between Lacey and Neilan and others at the agreed price of $160,000 net to Lacey and concluded this subject of the agreement in the following language: “All right, title and interest in said agreement of sale with T. J. Neilan et al., being hereby sold,…