Kunz

Kunz v. Anglo & London Paris National Bank

Good Law
1931 Cal. LEXIS 436·214 Cal. 341·5 P.2d 417
Supreme Court of CaliforniaNovember 25, 1931Docket No. S.F. 13514.California2,497 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Waste, J.

Respondent’s intestate deposited in escrow with the Anglo and London Paris National Bank of San Francisco a deed covering certain mining claims, with instructions to deliver the same to one H. W. Wernse, the grantee named therein, upon the payment by him of $2,500 within a specified period; otherwise the deed to be returned to the depositor. Within the time prescribed in the escrow instructions, but subsequent to Lee’s death, Wernse paid $2,500 to the bank and received the deed. This action was thereupon brought by the respondent, as administrator of Lee’s estate, to recover the money. In its answer, the defendant bank averred that the plaintiff and the intervener had made inconsistent claims upon it for the fund, that it was ignorant of the merits of these respective claims, and prayed that upon depositing the money in court it be dismissed from the action and the adverse claimants made to interplead, all of which was done. Judgment was entered awarding the fund to the respondent, as administrator of Lee’s estate, whereupon the intervener prosecuted this appeal.

Appellant’s claim to the money is founded upon the following instrument executed and delivered to him by Lee:

The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.