Longden

Los Angeles School Dist. v. Longden

Good Law
148 Cal. 380·1905 Cal. LEXIS 688·83 P. 246
Supreme Court of CaliforniaDecember 26, 1905L.A. No. 1802.California1,777 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Henshaw, J.

This is an original application to this court for a writ of mandate growing out of the following facts: The Los Angeles City School District of Los Angeles County comprises for its territory the city of Los Angeles and certain contiguous outlying lands. Its governing body is the board of trustees of Los Angeles City School District of Los Angeles County, whose members are the same as those of the board of education of the city of Los Angeles. This board of trustees, in compliance with the provisions of section 1880 et seq. of the Political Code, initiated proceedings for the issuance of bonds of the school district, which proceedings were regularly carried to the point where the board of trustees certified to the board of supervisors of the county its action in the premises, as provided by section 1884 of the Political Code. . The board of supervisors has refused to issue the bonds, as required by section 1884, upon the ground that the city of Los Angeles, as a municipal corporation, has, under its charter and the laws of the state, the sole and exclusive right to issue bonds for the purpose specified. This is the only issue presented by this controversy. It has been repeatedly…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.