McConoughey

McConoughey v. City of San Diego

Good Law
128 Cal. 366·1900 Cal. LEXIS 607·60 P. 925
Supreme Court of CaliforniaApril 7, 1900L.A. No. 675.California598 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Beatty, J.

This is a proceeding by one claiming to be a taxpayer and elector of the city of San Diego to contest an election held for the purpose of determining a proposition to incur a large indebtedness, and to issue bonds of the city to the amount of a million and a half of dollars for the construction or acquisition of waterworks.

The action is one which could not be maintained by anyone except a taxpayer or elector of the city, and the first finding made by the trial court is: “That the said A. M. McConoughey is not, and was not during any of the times mentioned in the amended complaint herein, an elector and taxpayer, or an elector or a taxpayer, of or in the said city of San Diego, California.” This ought to have ended the case, for the only legitimate object of the proceeding was to obtain a judgment binding upon the city, its taxpayers and electors, and they ought not to be bound by a litigation which the plaintiff had no right to institute or to maintain.

The court, however, proceeded to find upon all the issues in the case, and to make a decree affirming the validity of the election and the various proceedings involved. From this decree the plaintiff appeals. If he is neither a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.