Nat'l Bank of Cal. v. Exch. Nat'l Bank of Long Beach

Good Law
186 Cal. 172·1921 Cal. LEXIS 427·199 P. 1
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJune 15, 1921L. A. No. 5832.California3,446 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Wilbur, J.

Plaintiff recovered judgment in the lower court for the sum of $2,604.44. Defendant appeals. Previous to December 10, 1914, K. T. Bennett had performed a contract for the installation of electric lights along American Avenue, in the city of Long Beach, for which there had been issued to F. B. Amend, his assignee, by the board of public works of the city of Long Beach, assessment No. 167, where-under F. B. Amend was entitled to collect assessments aggregating $11,821.99 levied upon the property fronting upon said street, or in case of nonpayment thereof to have issued bonds for the unpaid assessments. On December 10, 1914, K. T. Bennett and his attorney and assignee, F. B. Amend, assigned and delivered the warrant and assessment to the defendant for collection, with written instructions for the disposition of the proceeds. These instructions authorized the defendant to collect the amounts due and to receive and sell bonds issued for the unpaid assessments. It was directed that the money received from the sale of such bonds should be deposited with the defendant in the name of K. T. Bennett and the same should be “subject to the instructions hereinafter given.” These instructions…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.