Divorce—Pleading—-Residence of Plaintiff—Bona Fides Need not be Alleged.—A complaint in an action for a divorce, in order to show that the plaintiff has had a residence in the state and county in which the action is brought for the periods required by section 128 of the Civil Code, need not in terms allege that his residence was 6orno fide. An allegation of residence therein for the required periods necessarily implies residence in good faith.

Id.—Divorce cannot be Granted on Admissions or Statements of Parties—-Admissions of Pleadings—Appeal.—In view of the express provisions of section 130 of the Civil Code, it is erroneous for a court to grant a divorce in the absence of some proof, independent of the admissions and statements of the parties, of the facts warranting such action; and a party appealing from a judgment of divorce may successfully urge such error as a ground for reversal, even though the essential fact was admitted by the pleadings.

Id.—Residence Jurisdictional Prerequisite to Divorce—Determination on Uncorroborated Statements or Admissions of Parties. The residence prescribed by section 128 of the Civil Code is essential to- the jurisdiction of a court to grant a divorce, and the complaint must allege such residence. The question whether such residence exists as matter of fact is to be determined by the trial court, but in its determination that court is controlled by the provisions of section 130 of the Civil Code, and cannot act on the- uncorroborated statement', admission, or testimony of the parties.

Id.—Reversal of Judgment—Affirmative Showing of Want of Corroboration.-—A judgment of divorce must be reversed where the bill of exceptions affirmatively shows that the trial court failed to require the essential proof of residence, and that it acted entirely, so far as- that question was concerned, on the uncorroborated admissions and statements of the parties.

Id.—Absence of Finding as to Residence—Collateral Attack.—It is not essential to the validity of a divorce decree as against collateral attach that there should be an express finding of fact on the question of the essential residence, or, indeed, express "findings of fact on any question.