Evans

Evans v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.

Good Law
1932 Cal. LEXIS 598·216 Cal. 495·14 P.2d 752
Supreme Court of CaliforniaSeptember 28, 1932Docket No. L.A. 13510.California1,198 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Plaintiff, a fireman employed by the City of Los Angeles, was injured in the line of duty by reason of the negligence of defendant’s employees operating a street-car. He was incapacitated, but under the terms of a city ordinance his full salary of $200 a month was paid. Medical and hospital treatment was also furnished him by the city. Plaintiff made no claim for compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, but brought an action for damages against defendant Los Angeles Railway Corporation. The city intervened, seeking a lien upon any judgment for sums paid to plaintiff, and also seeking recovery against defendant for any future liability to plaintiff under the Compensation Act. An offer of settlement was made by defendant and accepted by both plaintiff and intervener. The sum of $3,500 was thereupon deposited in court, and releases executed and delivered to defendant. The trial court then entered judgment in favor of the city in the amount of $778.14, the amount it had already paid to plaintiff, and in favor of plaintiff for the balance. It was provided, however, that the said balance should not be paid to plaintiff until he released the city from any future liability.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.