Napa Valley Electric Co. v. Calistoga Electric Co.

Good Law
174 Cal. 411·1917 Cal. LEXIS 811·163 P. 497
Supreme Court of CaliforniaFebruary 13, 1917S. F. No. 8193.California319 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

The plaintiff commenced an action in the superior court to enforce specific performance of an alleged contract for the sale of certain property, and sought an injunction pendente lite restraining the defendant from disposing of the property pending the determination of the action.

The superior court having granted a temporary restraining order, on the hearing of the application for an injunction pendente lite made its order denying the same and dissolving the temporary restraining order. It refused the request of the plaintiff to continue in force the temporary restraining order pending the determination of the appeal from the order denying an injunction pendente lite.

The plaintiff has appealed from such order and now. seeks from this court an order restraining the defendant, pending such appeal, from disposing of the property; in other words, it seeks from this court, pending the determination of the appeal, precisely the relief it sought to obtain from the superior court by an injunction pendente lite.

It was determined by this court in Hicks v. Michael et al., 15 Cal. 107, 112, 114 , that this court has no authority to grant such relief. At the time of that decision our…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.