J. M. Howell Co. v. Corning Irrigation Co.

Good Law
177 Cal. 513·1918 Cal. LEXIS 634·171 P. 100
Supreme Court of CaliforniaFebruary 16, 1918Sac. No. 2459.California1,943 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Shaw, J.

The defendants appeal from the judgment.

The plaintiffs, respectively, own tracts of land which are riparian to a stream known as Thornes Creek, in Tehama County. The defendant, Corning Irrigation Company is, and for many years has been, diverting water from said creek, and carrying the same to nonriparian lands belonging to its stockholders and there distributing the same to such stockholders for their use on such nonriparian lands. The object of the present action is to ascertain and determine the respective rights of the plaintiffs and the defendants in the waters of said stream, and to quiet the plaintiffs’ title to such part thereof as they are entitled to have flow down to their lands. The principal defendant is the Corning Irrigation Company, the other defendants being directors of said company and not otherwise interested in the action.

The complaint alleges that on May 14, 1894, in an action by the predecessors in interest of the plaintiffs, against the said corporation defendant, judgment was duly given, determining the respective rights of the parties in the creek; that the defendants have no right therein or thereto except as set forth and adjudged in said action,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.