Dahlberg

Dahlberg v. Dahlberg

Good Law
1927 Cal. LEXIS 347·202 Cal. 295·260 P. 290
Supreme Court of CaliforniaOctober 18, 1927Docket No. S.F. 12495.California1,406 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Motion to affirm judgment on the ground of the failure of appellant to print or set forth in his brief or any supplement thereto, in accordance with the requirements of section 953c of the Code of Civil Procedure, any part of the record herein sufficient to justify a reversal of said judgment. The action was instituted for the purpose of canceling two certain deeds of conveyance of real property whereby plaintiff purported to convey to defendant an un divided one-half of three certain parcels of land and also for the purpose of canceling a judgment of partition based upon said deeds. By the terms of said judgment one of said tracts of land was awarded to defendant herein and the two other tracts were awarded to plaintiff herein subject to a lien thereon of $11,497.05 in favor of the defendant herein. In appellant’s brief he claims “That by mutual mistakes of fact on the part of the attorneys for the respective parties in the partition suit, by the referees appointed by the court and by the court an erroneous estimate of values was made and considered and, based thereon, an erroneous judgment was entered in the partition proceedings to the detriment of appellant.” Yet appellant has…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.