Hatch

Hatch v. McCloud River Lumber Co.

Good Law
150 Cal. 111·1906 Cal. LEXIS 204·88 P. 355
Supreme Court of CaliforniaDecember 14, 1906S.F. No. 3641.California891 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Shaw, J.

This is an action to recover damages to the plaintiff Emma F. Hatch, wife of the plaintiff Kimball I. Hatch, arising from an injury alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant. A demurrer to the complaint was sustained in the court below, and judgment rendered accordingly. The sole question presented by this appeal is the sufficiency of the complaint.

On May 29, 1900, the defendant let to the plaintiff Kimball I. Hatch a dwelling-house and the lot on which it stood. The plaintiffs immediately took possession and remained in the occupancy of the premises until the injury occurred, which was on October 7, 1901. At the time the house was leased an electric-light pole was standing in the street, on the sidewalk, in front of the lot. From the top of this pole a stay-wire or rope extended to the ground, within the lot so leased, at a point two and a half feet inside of the front line thereof, where it was fastened to an anchor fixed in the earth. This wire inclined at an angle of forty-five degrees from the top of the pole to the ground, and crossed the front line of the lot about two and a half feet above the surface of the ground. The plaintiffs knew of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.