Platt

Platt v. Platt

Good Law
1928 Cal. LEXIS 486·205 Cal. 70·269 P. 657
Supreme Court of CaliforniaAugust 24, 1928Docket No. L.A. 10573.California283 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

The respondents move to affirm the judgment appealed from upon the ground that the appellant has failed to print in her opening brief or any supplement thereto, in accordance with the requirements of section 953c of the Code of Civil Procedure, any part of the record herein sufficient to justify a reversal of said judgment. At the time of the filing of respondents’ notice of motion to affirm the state of the record was such as would have warranted an affirmance of the judgment, for the appellant’s opening brief falls far short of satisfying the requirements of section 953c, supra. However, subsequent to the filing of the notice of motion to affirm, but prior to the making of such motion, the appellant, with permission of court, filed herein a supplement to her opening brief in which she sets out at length the complaint, the amended answer thereto, the trial court’s findings'of fact and conclusions of law, the judgment, the notice of appeal, the notice to prepare transcript, several exhibits introduced in evidence, appellant’s assignments of error, and certain of the testimony adduced upon the trial. In view of this showing we think the motion to affirm should be denied. This…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.