Mechanic’s Lien—Materials for Construction of Railroad—Claim of Lien.—Alien for materials used in the construction of a railroad must, in general, be claimed and enforced against the entire road, and not merely against that part thereof for which the materials were furnished.

Id.—Sufficiency of Description—Name of Road Indicating Proposed Terminus—Reference to “Present” Terminus—Implication.—A claim of lien which stated that the claimant furnished certain materials which were used in the construction “of that certain railway known as and called the Sierra Valleys and Mohawk Railway” (Mohawk valley, in Plumas county, being its proposed westerly terminus), includes the. entire railway by general description. A further particular description of the road as commencing at its easterly starting point and continuing through points specified “to its present westerly terminus,” particularly described, which was twelve miles short of its proposed westerly terminus, is not inconsistent with the general description, but implies that the road was projected westerly beyond the described terminus, and the claim includes the then incompleted westerly extension of the railroad.

Id.—Record of Claim—Railroad Lying in Two Counties.—The statute does not require the claim of lien to be recorded in each county in which the railroad is situated; and, where it lies in two counties, the claim of lien may be recorded in either county.

Id.—Void Contract—Statement in Claim—Value of Materials—Contract Price.-—Where the contract for the construction of an extension cf the railroad was void for want of record, the claim of lien may properly state the contract price for the materials, and such statement is a sufficient showing prima -facie of their value.

Id.—Pleading—Allegation of Value—Certainty.—The complaint for foreclosure of the claim of lien sufficiently alleges the value of the materials by alleging the contract price at which they are furnished in the absence of a demurrer for uncertainty.

Id.—Proof of Value—Admission of Answer.—Where the averment of the complaint as to the contract price for the materials was neither specially demurred to nor denied by the answer, the value of the materials need not be proved at the trial.