Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Hawthorne, Etc. v. Environmental Protection Agency

Good Law
525 F.2d 1366
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 13, 197573--3279California488 words

Opinion

Opinion

525 F.2d 1366 COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF the CITY OF HAWTHORNE, etc., et al., Petitioners, v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY et al., Respondents. No. 73--3279. * United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Nov. 13, 1975. Barry Wolf, San Jose, Cal. (argued), for City of Santa Rosa and others. Henry C. Thumann, Los Angeles, Cal. (argued), for Ernest W. Hahn, Inc., and others. David Toomey, New York City, N.Y. (argued), for J. C. Penney Co., Inc., and others. Joel Moskowitz, Los Angeles, Cal., and Mark I. Weinberger, Sacramento, Cal. (argued), for Trustees of the Cal. State Universities and Colleges, and others. John H. Findley, Sacramento, Cal. (argued), for Pacific Legal Foundation. Neil T. Proto, Washington, D.C., and John J. Graves, Jr., Las Vegas, Nev. (argued), for the Environmental Protection Agency. ORDER OF DISMISSAL Before WRIGHT, KILKENNY and SNEED, Circuit Judges. 1 No Petitioner, pursuant to our Order of August 15, 1975, informed this Court within 21 days thereafter of issues other than those dealt with by our August 15, 1975 Order which it wished this Court to review. Under these circumstances, it is proper for this Court to dismiss finally these petitions…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.