Union Bank, a California Corporation v. Winnebago Industries, Inc., an Iowa Corporation

Good Law
528 F.2d 95·1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 11812
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 24, 197574--2784California2,231 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wallace, J.

Before WRIGHT and WALLACE, Circuit Judges, and POWELL, District Judge.

Union Bank, a California corporation, filed suit in the Los Angeles County Superior Court against Winnebago Industries, Inc. (Winnebago), an Iowa corporation, on a contract claim. Based upon diversity of citizenship, Winnebago removed the action to federal district court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441 . The district court thereafter granted a motion for summary judgment for Union Bank and, in addition, awarded attorney’s fees based upon a finding of bad faith by Winnebago. We affirm the granting of the summary judgment; we reverse the award of attorney’s fees.

Winnebago is a manufacturer and wholesale distributor of recreational motor vehicles. It sells these vehicles through franchised retail dealers who often finance their inventory by “flooring” arrangements with lending institutions. A flooring arrangement is an extension of credit between a bank and a dealer. The dealer orders and receives vehicles from the manufacturer; the manufacturer’s invoice is paid directly by the bank and the dealer repays this amount plus interest to the bank upon reselling the vehicle at retail.

Prior to 1972, Winnebago…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.