United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Good Law
528 F.2d 143
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 31, 1975143California12,363 words

Opinion

Opinion

528 F.2d 143 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard TURNER, Defendant-Appellant. * Nos. 73--2740, 73--2937, 73--2959, 73--3082, 73--3083, 73--3156, 73--3159, 73--3168, 73--3575, 74--1057, 74--1085, 74--1151, 74--1322, 74--1465. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. July 24, 1975. Certiorari Denied Dec. 1, 1975. See 96 S.Ct. 426 . As amended Dec. 31, 1975. Martha Goldin (argued), Saltzman & Goldin, Hollywood, Cal., for appellants Turner, Grimes, Howard Lewis, Woodrow, Ethridge, Sharon Johnson. Michael Kenny and Jerry Newton, Asst. U.S. Attys. (argued), Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee in all cases. Allan B. Streller, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant Hall. Laurie Harris, Deputy Federal Defender (argued), Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant John Henry Lewis. Sull Lawrence, Beverly Hills, Cal., for appellant Henry Bernard Johnson. Leslie A. Kast (argued), West Covina, Cal., for appellants Hackett, Ollie Lee Johnson. Armen Hampar, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellants, Nice, Roberts, Gibson. Robert S. Michaels (argued), Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant Sneed. OPINION Before MERRILL, KOELSCH and KILKENNY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: 1 Fourteen separate appeals…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.