Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,404, 1 Employee Benefits Ca 1143 Frank A. Klaus v. Hi-Shear Corporation, Frank A. Klaus v. Hi-Shear Corporation, a California Corporation, and Hi-Shear Caribe, a California Corporation, Frank A. Klaus v. George S. Wing and Perry A. Luth

528 F.2d 225 Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,404, 1 Employee Benefits Ca 1143 Frank A. KLAUS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HI-SHEAR CORPORATION et al., Defendants-Appellees. Frank A. KLAUS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. HI-SHEAR CORPORATION, a California Corporation, and Hi-Shear Caribe, a California Corporation, Defendants-Appellants. Frank A. KLAUS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. George S. WING and Perry A. Luth, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 75--1544, 75--1920, 75--1389, 75--1394, 75--2380, 75--2446 and 75--2012. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Dec. 15, 1975. Ernest Leff (argued), of Hahn, Cazier, Hoegh & Leff, Peter Taft (argued), of Munger, Tolles, Hills & Rickershauser, Ira Rivin (argued) of Epport & Delevie, Alan Stamm (argued), of Long & Levit, James W. McCord (argued), of Bodkin, Breslin & Luddy, Los Angeles, Cal., Jeffrey D. Jennings (argued), of Scales, Patton, Ellsworth & Corbett, San Diego, Cal., for appellants in Nos. 75--1389, 75--1394, 75--2446, 75--2012, 75--2380 and for appellees in Nos. 75--1544, 75--1920. Samuel O. Pruitt (argued), of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee in Nos. 75--2380, 75--2012, 75--2446, 75--1389, 75--1394,…