John Dodge v. Mitsui Shintaku Ginko K. K. Tokyo, and Brady-Hamilton Stevedore Co., Intervenor-Appellee

Good Law
528 F.2d 669
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 19, 197675--1442California1,833 words

Opinion

Opinion

Barnes, J.

Plaintiff, John Dodge, a longshoreman employed by Brady-Hamilton Stevedore Co., suffered injuries when he slipped in snow and ice while working aboard the vessel of defendant Mitsui Shintaku Ginko K. K. Tokyo (herein Mitsui). Under the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act ( 33 U.S.C. § 901 et seq.), Dodge received compensation and medical benefits from his employer in the total amount of $1,454.92 and brought this third-party action against Mitsui for damages. Brady-Hamilton intervened, seeking reimbursement of its payments under the Act if Dodge were successful in his suit.

The District Judge found both Mitsui and Brady-Hamilton were each fifty percent negligent, that Dodge was not contributorily negligent, and (upon stipulation between the parties) that plaintiff had sustained general and special damages amounting to $9,000; and that Brady-Hamilton was entitled to a lien of $1,454.92 against Dodge’s recovery, representing compensation it paid to Dodge under the Act.

On appeal, Mitsui, the vessel owner, contends that the equal concurring negligence of Brady-Hamilton should result in a fifty percent reduction of Dodge’s judgment against ■ the third party.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.